[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:34:31 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <v03007805b7add044e7f5@[128.195.186.34]>
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> Btw, there are two quite substantial chunks of Lojban in my 'retractions
> Part 2' message. Yet to see anyone even respond to them, let alone comment
> on their usage... (Does that mean my usage doesn't decide anything? :-)
I will! I have yet to have the sort of uninterrupted block of time I need!
-----
"It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution
never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object
of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every
shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously
occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of
manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950
- Prev by Date:
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- Next by Date:
RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban]si'o)
- Previous by thread:
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- Next by thread:
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- Index(es):