[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban]si'o)
Nick:
> I'm going to have to say this again.
>
> No, don't stop me.
>
> I really really mean it.
>
> ... This construction should have died in the arse.
LOL... (It's a real viscerally-palpable pleasure to have you back
among us!)
But we really should be congratulating Jorge for doing what so many
Lojbanists say is a prime motive for their interest in Lojban and a
prime hope for what Lojban will achieve: Jorge is whorfianly
exploiting the resources of Lojban to conceptualize things in a way
that we hitherto would not have thought of conceptualizing them.
As I mentioned in an earlier message, the me...me'o serendipity is a
bit of a redherring, because there is a nonserendipitous way of
getting sumti+MOI.
--And.
- Prev by Date:
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- Next by Date:
soi (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn
- Previous by thread:
RE: [lojban] Snowballs in hell was Re: mine, thine
- Next by thread:
Re: mine, thine, hisn, hern, itsn ourn, yourn and theirn (was[lojban] si'o)
- Index(es):