Alan Post wrote:
And +1 on your suggestion of transforming the grammar into something that would be easier to write software for interpretation. I can peform my future study with an eye toward this as well.
I'm not one of them, but some people find the E-BNF to be much more "natural" for them than the formal YACC grammar.
lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.