[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Yet Another Tangent: my first cmavo definition



Not a clue, but it doesn't matter because you'll need to create a
tracker to use it (and I think Trackers are disabled).  Come on IRC;
several people there have admin, and can give it to you (point them
at this post if they balk) if they know how; if not, I'm aronud most
of the time.

-Robin

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 04:30:32PM +0800, Oren wrote:
> I think it would be even more inviting (and more portable) if we
> made an info-box sort of thing, like this:
> http://doc.tikiwiki.org/Pretty+Tracker?bl=y
> 
> Saves a lot of cutting and pasting. Is this plugin installed?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 15:09, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:43:07PM +0800, Oren wrote:
> >> I guess the real question is, after 13 years, how do we make this
> >> happen. Robin's essay includes some new nomenclature, but no
> >> fundamental refutation of the current policy; he and others appear
> >> to be saying that by reaffirming the BPFK's authoritative role in
> >> proscribing proper lojban, things will fall into place.
> >>
> >> It was supposed to take six months back when you still introduced
> >> the WWW by its full name (read the original announcement). Now we
> >> have a wiki and several hundred subscribers to the English mailing
> >> list. Let's get the cmavo definitions done. Here, I just tried
> >> one, someone check it for me.
> >>
> >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section:+Attitudinal+Modifiers#Proposed_Definition_of_be_u
> >
> > I very much appreciate you doing this.  :)  I just wrote, and
> > posted, http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Community+Work to basically
> > ask for more of the same.
> >
> > I'm afraid my template doesn't match what you did very well, and I
> > specifically asked people not to do the parenthetical
> > chatting-on-the-wiki-page thing, but I still think it's great you
> > went ahead and did it; gives me some hope that maybe *this* time the
> > larger community will actually help.  :)
> >
> > -Robin
> >
> > --
> > They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
> > And I'm  thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
> > other  than  the default  outcome?"  See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
> > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 

-- 
They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
And I'm  thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
other  than  the default  outcome?"  See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.