[lojban] Re: Request For Help; non-urgent research request to help Lojban.

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

On Apr 17, 7:34 am, Jonathan Jones <eyeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All of the vocab entries I saw were missing their place structures.

Yes, I don't know if I explicitly wrote that in the article, but if I
haven't, I will. We're not including full definitions in the lists
because it causes too much clutter and is far too complicated.
Instead, we're going to be linking the corresponding Lojban word to
its JVS article, which keeps the list small and tidy, but allows
access to a more full definition in JVS style. I find that it's a nice
compromise.

By the way, this is just one more way to help out. If you see a word
that isn't linked back to JVS, link it back. No need to create JVS
articles just yet if they don't exist, especially if we haven't agreed
on a particular word yet, but if it already exists, it would be very
helpful.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.