[lojban] Re: Questions about jorne

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

> Lojban, as a human language, can't offer what these robust proposals
> describe-- that is, you can't really argue that lojban is any more
> 'readable' than these languages, nor believe that it would be briefer or
> more thorough; but it may be fun to try and define the entire lojban
> vocabulary using these technologies. Or maybe that's what you meant all
> along?

Uhhh... that looks like a slightly unreadable version of Lojban using
English words.
I really fail to see the difference here, so I gather you're saying
"Lojban can't do what this thing does that looks like a shitty/
inadequate version of Lojban." ? I'm really confused about your
meaning.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.