Re: [lojban] bug in le cmalu noltru?

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> ni'o fo le cukta cu cusku lu lo sincrboa cu tunlo lo se kalte be sy fau
>    lo nu ky mulno gi'enai se marxa ibabo sy de'a kakne lo nu muvdu kei
>    gi'e sipna ze'a lo masti be li xa be'o poi se kuspe lo befctiru'e li'u
>
> Wouldn't the {lu li'o li'u} fill the x5 (non-existent) place of {cusku}
> since it starts with {fo le cukta}?  If I say {fe mi le cukta cu dunda}
> wouldn't the {le cukta} fill x3?

I thought you were going to comment on the x2 of "tunlo".

The rule I prefer is that FAs don't alter the placement of untagged
sumti (just like BAI and other tags), but in this particular case it
doesn't matter much if you interpret the lu li'u as just some
uttereance related in an unspecified way to the saying rather than as
the actual saying.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.