Re: [lojban] Named multiples

[purpleposeidon <purpleposeidon@gmail.com>]

Xorxes, do you have a grammar containing all of your changes? I know
that you've got a tense-simplification proposal on the Tiki.

On 5/8/10, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyway, besides all these reform proposals :), there IS somewhere in
>> the official grammar where cmevla don't lose their meaning: When
>> attached into a lujvo with "zei".  And so that's one way I'd think to
>> translate your sentence:
>>
>>    mi klama fu lo .opel. zei karce
>
> Yes, good point, or even:
>
>       mi klama fu lo me zei .opel.
>
> if you feel that adding "karce" is unnecessary or redundant.
>
> The fact that we already can create the brivla "me zei ...." from any
> cmevla is another indicator that cmevla should be brivla, like the
> rest of open class words.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.