El 16/05/2010 09:33 p.m., Luke Bergen escribió: > Isn't that why the whole voting system? > >> On May 16, 2010 8:20 PM, "james riley" <jimr1603@gmail.com >> <mailto:jimr1603@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Someone (read, not me. Well, not for a few months) needs to trawl JVS >> for repeats. And do something about them. Clearly it shouldn't be up >> to one person to decide which is the better word, so they should post >> the list of repeats somewhere in the wiki. >> >> Cmacis >> >> >> >> On 17 May 2010 01:14, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com >> <mailto:lindarthebard@yahoo.com>> wrote: >> > >> > I'm updating the Bathroom and Hy... >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. There are two kinds of repetitions from my point of view: - Valsi with more than one definition for a single language. - More than one valsi for a single meaning (gloss word, and sense) The voting system (correct me if I'm wrong) only solves the first. The second is a problem for me too. But I can't imagine a system to resolve this, other than "let's usage decide" (don't hang me for this). Use the word you like more, and if your listener doesn't understand, a meta-discusion will solve it. -- My lojban journal: http://learninglojban.wordpress.com My personal blog: http://leomolas.tumblr.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature