[lojban] fu'ivla's definition: loanword or morphological class

[symuyn <rbysamppi@gmail.com>]

There have been some discussions on the IRC room about {fu'ivla} and
its proper definition.

People currently use {fu'ivla} to refer to: A. general loanwords
between any two languages or B. the Lojban morphological class of
brivla. These are definitely two different concepts, though they
happen to overlap a lot in Lojban.

The question is: which definition should {fu'ivla} be defined to have?

(Whatever the community or—should the community not come up with a
consensus—the BPFK decides, either case would require a new word being
used to refer to the opposite concept.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.