Re: [lojban] zo pu'o sumtcita

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

  Of course, Xorxes and I have never seen eye to eye on the  ZAho
sumtcita.  I think your first construction was fine (but yes,
substituting jutmrobi'o or co'i jutmro for jutmro.

       --gejyspa


On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 July 2010 09:05:45 Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>  lo dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmro ca lo tersei be lo bakrycedra bei
>> lo cibmoicedra
> On Thursday 08 July 2010 09:21:30 tijlan wrote:
>> This appears to say that all dinosaurs *were* extinct between "lo
>> bakrycedra" and "lo cibmoicedra" rather than that they *went* extinct
>> during that span. I suggest:
>>
>>  ro dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmro co'a lo bakrycedra bi'o cibmoicedra
>
> "lo bakrycedra bi'o cibmoicedra" doesn't sound sensible, as each is a span of
> time, and the first ends when the second starts (many paleontologists believe
> that the boundary was an asteroid impact). How about Jorge's version
> with "jutmrobi'o"?:
>
> lo dinsauro jenai cipni cu jutmrobi'o ca lo tersei be lo bakrycedra bei lo
> cibmoicedra
>
> Pierre
> --

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.