[lojban] Re: (to all coders) what's missing IMO.

[Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>]

> snapping thing: I'd be content with a parser that has error messages
> that give hints as to what might actually work, like "What you can't
> put a relative clause there, but *this* might work...". Tho maybe
> that'd be harder.

Use lojbansuggest and develop a thingy that looks for those
constructs, like upon parsing it'll look for things like *{.i COI
*cmene* UI *terbri* *selbri* *terbri*} and suggest putting the UI
first (common {.i doi .cmen. xu do broda} when really meant {.i xu
doi .cmen. do broda}.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.