Dnia piątek, 10 września 2010 o 03:36:36 Luke Bergen napisał(a):
> Theoretically speaking I tend to agree with lindar. When syllable count is
> equal, I prefer {ku} to {cu}. For the programmers out there, {cu} feels
> like a goto statement. i.e. sloppy and shortcut-esque.
It depends on the programmer and their preferred language, probably. I am a programmer too (surprise!) and I have no problems with {cu} whatsoever. Yes, in C-type languages you have to pedantically close all those curly braces, but in Python you just stop indenting. Even in LISP, where you have to match those parens (unless your dialect has a superparen), you just lump them together when you finish a larger sexp.
So no, I don't think it's like the sloppy and dirty GOTO. It's more like a tagged break statement, which we all know is clean and elegant and structural ;)
--
Ecce Jezuch
"Adapting, shifting, lacking opinion, our numbers exceeding the billions
Everly walking among ourselves down the Corridor of Chameleons"
- T. Haake
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.