Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

I'd call it remge'a if anything, because humans can count how many terms are on both sides, while fish (jboski) cannot.
 

2010/9/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

> to be honest, at the time I wasn't sure what you meant by that following
> sentence.  (I'm still not sure what you meant).

That I'm not a fan of "nu'i".

> Why would this sentence require nu'i?  How else could {broda ge lo brode lo
> brodi gi lo brodi lo brode} be parsed?

With the official grammar it is ungrammatical/unparsable.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.