Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

haha, I like it.  xorxe:  x1 is of/related to the ideal implementation/use of lojban

2010/9/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

It's parsable by camxes.

Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxe

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.