haha, I like it. xorxe: x1 is of/related to the ideal implementation/use of lojban2010/9/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?
It's parsable by camxes.
Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".
mu'o mi'e xorxe