[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question

Okay, what is the best working parser we have right now?

I know about jbofi'e, which lojban.org says only works on the jboski page;
LogGloss, or something based off {tavla cipni}, which I can't get to work and for which the most recent build is available I can't connect to;
and .camxes., for which I don't have a clue.

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
.i.ua.ui smuni zo xorge'a


On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
haha, I like it.  xorxe:  x1 is of/related to the ideal implementation/use of lojban

2010/9/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

It's parsable by camxes.

Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxe


--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu




--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.