[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] "ge ... gi ..." question

2010/9/14 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I take it that under xorge'a it is parsable?

It's parsable by camxes.

Should we make "xor" a rafsi for "xorxes"? It would be the first case
of a cmevla with a rafsi. Or maybe we should promote the cmevla to a
gismu "xorxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxe

I'm all for {xorxe}, but what would it mean?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.