Re: [lojban] la lojbo kurji

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

Can the objects of COI be {.e}'ed together like that?

2010/10/7 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM, .alyn.post.
<alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> I've written an oath for myself regarding Lojban.  This stretched my
> fluency a bit, so I'd like some feedback on how I might make it
> better.
>
>  ni'o mi me la lojbo kurji
>  .i mi ca nupre lo za'i go'o kei mi .e la lojbo kurji

For an oath "nu'e" is better than "mi ca nupre". You are not reporting
that someone (in this case yourself) is making a promise. You are
actually making the promise.
So "nu'e mi .e la lojbo kurji do'u go'o".

>  .i mi ba tavla fo la lobjan. de'i lo ro djedi

"lo ro djedi" is not a date, you want "ca" not "de'i".

And "ca ro (lo) djedi", unless you are content to do it at some single
point in time valid for all days.

>  .i mi ba jmina lo cnino nupre lo vi nupre

"Add a new oath-taker to this here oath-taker"?

If you mean "a new commitment to this commitment" then its "lo cnino
se nupre lo dei se nupre", but maybe you are promising to add adepts,
I don't know.

>  .i ganai mi tavla fi no da de'i lo cabdei gi mi tavla fi lo vi nupre

"ca lo cabdei"

So, either you talk about something, or you talk about yourself?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.