Re: [lojban] Oh gods more debating. (This time about {ni}!)

[Ross Ogilvie <oges007@gmail.com>]

The conversation and proposal should probably be moved the the Abstractors section, which is meant to include both ce'u, ka and ni. The Aristotelean abstractors are only mo'u, pu'u, zu'o and za'i. (And why they are called that I have no idea).

On the content: Aghh, my mind is destroyed. I'll have to read it again and look up the CLL before I can form an opinion.

Ross

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Section%3A+Aristotelean+Abstractors&no_bl=y

At the bottom please.

You may thank me with money, worship, or both.
=D

(Let me know what you think.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.