"anything which exhibits a quaility Q of not-being-able-to-Y
which measures somewhere between 0 and X's value of Q (inclusive) can
Y, but probably nothing whose value of Q is higher than X's value of
Q".
Shouldn't that be just "X is surprisingly good at Q"?
-- mu'o mi'e lex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.