[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] type/token distinction



On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:16 PM, .alyn.post.
<alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>
>> sucta?
>
> does it make sense to use dacti/sucta together for this?

I was thinking sucta/se sucta.

A token doesn't have to be a material object, non-material objects
have the type-token distinction as well. And I would say a
material-object type is a material object, but I don't want to start
the "lo" discussion all over again.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.