mu'o mi'e latros.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ian Johnson
<blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps it is the static typer in me, but I would go so far as to say that it does not make sense for a place in a gismu to be able to be an abstraction or a concrete object. Objects filling a given predicate place have to fulfill certain basic, fundamental requirements to make semantic sense, and I think this is one of them. To me, even though I use "want" in this way in English, a {se djica} being a concrete object is like adding a function to a number.