[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] lujvo deconstruction
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/1 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> In deconstructing "cakrespa", it thinks it splits as "calku zei respa"
>> rather than the correct "ca kerfa zei spati".
>
> That's not a very good example, since the {ca} falls off and the lujvo is
> actually {krespa}, which is correctly split. I wouldn't expect jvozba to
> correctly handle a fake lujvo that was purposely intended to fool it.
I would. That's the whole point of having a self-segregating
morphology, isn't it?
It also thinks that li'ela'i is a lujvo, rather than two cmavo.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.