On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:You can always use "to" or "to'i" instead of "sei". The only reason
> {sei} is more like {to} than {lo}, lindar.
SEI exists separate from TO is so that the terminator can almost
always be elided. As it is, "se'u" is practically never needed.
Allowing trailing sumti would mean that "se'u" would almost always be
needed. In that case, it wouldn't have made sense to introduce sei at
all, since there was already to. Semantically, sei and to are
basically the same.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.