Nothing done blindly is virtuous.stevoOn Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
.u'u .i sa'u .i broda cei ko'a sevmrori'a va'ojemu'i lo nu lo nu nei kei cu rinka lo nu lo drata cu jmive .i brode cei ko'a na'e pensi gi'e romoi broda va'o lo nu cumki .i brodi cei ko'a pensi .ijebo va'o lo nu lo drata cu zmadu ko'a lo ka vajni lo remna keikei ko'a broda lo drata .iku'ibo va'o lo nu ko'a zmadu lo drata kei ko'a na broda .i zmadu fi lo ka virdu kei fi'a brode fi'a brodi
.u'ucai
I think this is one of those times where my lojban is just not up to the task of expressing such a complex concept. In english then: is it more virtuous to blindly sacrifice onesself in order to save another, or is it more virtuous to consider probabalistically which life is more important to hummanity and act accordingly?
i.e. if bob is on the brink of a breakthrough cure for cancer, should he be considered virtuous for sacrificing his life to save a homeless guy on the street?
On Jan 20, 2011 5:16 PM, "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.