On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Ian Johnson
<blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
{cei} is sorta hard to use. You have to realize that you're going to hold basically your entire bridi (unless you override the sumti later) in a variable, and you have to do that right as you say the selbri, or the grammatical opportunity goes away. In some sense the way {cei} works now is like a forethought connective. I'm proposing that it have an afterthought counterpart; that is, that VAU CEI become grammatical, and that it do pretty much what you expect:
ko'a broda ko'e ko'i vau cei brode == ko'a broda cei brode ko'e ko'i.
To some extent you can work around this already, like:
ko'a broda ko'e ko'i .i go'i cei broda .i ko'o broda ...
But it does not allow you to do an equivalent of:
.i lo nu ko'a broda ko'e ko'i vau cei brode cu brodi .i ko'o brode ...
In principle I suppose this could be a cmavo unto itself, but I don't really see why.
Any thoughts?
mu'o mi'e .latros.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.