Re: [lojban] "lo no"

[Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>]

On 18 May 2011 23:35, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>   b)  This may be opening up another can of worms, but I'm not convinced
> that pimu shouldn't be allowed with mei.  If I am speaking of a number of
> oranges, why can't I have a half of one?  And from that universe of one half
> orange, I can talk about a smaller amount.  pipa lo pimu najnimre cu fusra
>

Logical quantifiers are cardinals, {pimu} is not.
{pipa lo pimu najnimre cu fusra}, if accepted, would probably mean
{lo pipasi'e be lo pimusi'e be lo pa najnimre cu fusra}.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.