Re: [lojban] sedu'o no natfe...

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Since a recently concluded (?) discussion resulted (I think) in the declaration 
that {lo no ...} is automatically suspect, even meaningless, I suppose the 
second version should be eliminated, although the rest of the sentence does seem 
to allow for some aberrence. 




----- Original Message ----
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Sent: Tue, May 31, 2011 11:03:44 AM
Subject: [lojban] sedu'o no natfe...

One of my sigs is "sedu'o no natfe puze'e noroi nalselganse srera". I'm not 
sure if I said that right.
1. Should it be "sedu'o no natfe" or "sedu'o lo no natfe"? If the latter, the 
third is moot.
2. Is it "puze'e" or "ze'epu"?
3. Should "sedu'o no natfe" be before or after "noroi"?

Pierre
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.