[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] sedu'o no natfe...

On Tuesday 31 May 2011 13:59:15 John E Clifford wrote:
> Since a recently concluded (?) discussion resulted (I think) in the
> declaration that {lo no ...} is automatically suspect, even meaningless, I
> suppose the second version should be eliminated, although the rest of the
> sentence does seem to allow for some aberrence.

Do you think "sedu'onai lo natfe" would work? There may indeed be some 
evidence to the contrary, but it is unknown and undetected.

Pierre
-- 
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.