Re: [lojban] sedu'o no natfe...

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> One of my sigs is "sedu'o no natfe puze'e noroi nalselganse srera". I'm not
> sure if I said that right.
> 1. Should it be "sedu'o no natfe" or "sedu'o lo no natfe"? If the latter, the
> third is moot.

I'll leave that one to those who think that "lo no natfe" is sound.

> 2. Is it "puze'e" or "ze'epu"?

The Book says "ze'epu", but I think either works.

> 3. Should "sedu'o no natfe" be before or after "noroi"?

"no da no de zo'u ..." = "ro da naku naku su'o de zo'u ..." = "ro da
su'o de zo'u", so your double "no" could be rephrased as:

sedu'o ro natfe puze'e su'oroi nalselganse srera

Unless of course "no natfe" is supposed to be embedded in a
subordinate clause, something like "fau lo nu djuno no natfe", in
which case the quantifier cannot jump out to the main clause's prenex.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.