Re: [lojban] non-ka properties

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

2011/6/18 Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>:
>
> These non-ka properties are then just lambda expressions
> which return different kinds of values. It appears only logical
> that {ce'u} should be used.

"ce'u" is not used for the return value, it is used to mark the slot
of the property holder. The slot for the return value is marked with
"ma kau".

> The best I have come up with are
> constructions such as
>    {ko'a jibni ko'e lo se stuzi be ce'u}.
>
> Nevertheless, this directly contradicts the gimste, which
> specifically asks for a {ka} or {ni}. The CLL does not
> mention any possible use of {ce'u} outside an abstraction
> either.
>
> What am I missing?
> How are these ideas expressed in the current corpus?

ko'a jibni ko'e lo ka makau stuzi ce'u
ko'a is close to ko'e in location ("in what their locations are").

ko'a dunli ko'e lo ka makau cmene ce'u
ko'a is equal to ko'e in name ("in what their names are").

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.