Re: [lojban] Re: How it should have been. And how it could be.

[tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>]

On 29 June 2011 10:23, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
> The worst thing that can happen is that there be many different
> new-words to convey "the same meaning".

If those new words each *convey* one stable meaning as they should,
there wouldn't be much of a problem. It's ok to have "nanla",
"nakyve'a", "citnau", etc. with the same meaning, provided that the
meaning can be unambiguously understood. A worse case would be a word
with competing and equally-sound definitions.


mu'o mi'e tijlan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.