[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Possible error in camxes / PEG grammar (handling of elidable elements)

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> I think this will be a non-trivial PEG change, so it's not
> surprising you didn't find it.

I think the fix should be trivial, just replace:

term-1 <- sumti / ( !gek (tag / FA-clause free*) (sumti / KU-clause?
free*) ) / termset / NA-clause KU-clause free*

with:

term-1 <- sumti / ( !gek (tag !selbri-1 / FA-clause free*) (sumti /
KU-clause? free*) ) / termset / NA-clause KU-clause free*

I'm pretty sure we have dscussed this one before. If I'm not mistaken,
the current PEG is consistent with the official YACC and BNF.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.