On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Remo Dentato
<rdentato@gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is
reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short
rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is
incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both
{-zen-} and {-ze'a-}.
I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any
way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi?
remod
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.