[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi

To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:57:33 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=o7HGMzWcvGFgXyUR3QihwhKxtpa17qCLwtSMHoyS4Wg=; b=MQPSUsOctnjX3Xuequ+Vnm/IilgYNPAU3zh9vc1U/EtqRqDxQTjVwE0sxIkSDkpKJB IarOZeQXlJcr4qqoL/BOpq9Nz8dAsnlZ1mn+NF/4GVhrGePMt8GLFgtZECKZNdQTaB6A EMQMoaCR753u37QbhtKbEaMno/ePKV68zcp4g=
In-reply-to: <CAEimHHCwywmzCYs6rCXF-OY-_xEPudpgz9RCPtSX_iu=vJPMmg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAAQ0imP3-BjXbP63cbNA1n29=5TZoB+adrJRq5pyt1Ycu015Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEimHHCwywmzCYs6rCXF-OY-_xEPudpgz9RCPtSX_iu=vJPMmg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think "ia" is a legal diphthong outside of UI.

I forgot about the diphtong restriction (I had to chect CLL 4.6).

All the other possible short rafsi are taken then :(

Why is that restriction in place? Is that because, without "ia" being
a diphtong, {jia} is two sillable?

I wonder if this is a morphological restriction we could eliminate in
the future ...

remod.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

References:
- [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
  - From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
  - From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread