Re: [lojban] proportions

[djandus <jandew@gmail.com>]

Thanks all for the awesome help!

However, something did raise a question:

Well, assuming 'lo mi cutci' is lost and gone forever (L3)

Umm... what did this side-statement mean? Are you referring to "lost" in the scope of this discussion, or in the scope of some grammar change I've missed?

I'm teaching a Lojban class right now, and want to be absolutely certain I haven't missed some discussion ridding Lojban of the {lo mi cutci} == {lo cutci pe mi} rule. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/bEJQf-LNL6cJ.
 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.