Re: [lojban] proportions

["John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Well, it was an assumption, brought on by everybody using the long forms rather than the short -- and my recollection that things like 'va' and 'ca' no longer seem to go in the slot after 'lo'. I'll be happy to find it is not gone.

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 30, 2011, at 23:08, djandus <jandew@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks all for the awesome help!

However, something did raise a question:

Well, assuming 'lo mi cutci' is lost and gone forever (L3)

Umm... what did this side-statement mean? Are you referring to "lost" in the scope of this discussion, or in the scope of some grammar change I've missed?

I'm teaching a Lojban class right now, and want to be absolutely certain I haven't missed some discussion ridding Lojban of the {lo mi cutci} == {lo cutci pe mi} rule. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/bEJQf-LNL6cJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.