On Sep 15, 2011 8:12 AM, "Ian Johnson" <
blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eh, {milxe} is troubling too, I guess. I suppose just {to'e cafne} is about
> the only one that is clear.
>
> Incidentally, I should say that the second sense does make a degree of
> sense.
>
> mu'o mi'e latros .i .u'u mi co'e li re
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ian Johnson <
blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I find it to be a stretch, since {milxe} is so much more appropriate for
>> the first meaning than {cmalu}.
>>
>> .i ku'i .u'i .i .a'o cilre lo drata lo nu do ctuca fo la lojban .i mu'o
>> mi'e latros
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:15 AM, djandus <
jandew@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In teaching my class, a fun exchange was made while covering {be} and {mo}
>>>
>>> I first asked Henry how he liked me:
>>> doi .enrin. do mo nelci mi
>>> To which he responded
>>> mutce
>>>
>>> Then I took things further
>>> Me: mi mo gletu le mamta be do ku
>>> H: cmalu .a'o
>>> Where he intended "Not much, I hope."
>>>
>>> The fun pun part comes when we thought about applying {cmalu} to
>>> describing {le gasnu poi gletu zi'e po'u lo pinji}
>>>
>>> My question: Does this really work as a Lojban pun? If so, awesome! If
>>> not, why?
>>>
>>> mu'o mi'e djos
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "lojban" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/4Z-amuS6WpcJ.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
lojban@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>