Re: [lojban] Should we have another mailing list for abstruse discussions?

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

I have checked out of that discussion myself.  I'm not comfortable
with the suggestion that it belongs somewhere else, though.  I don't
think conversations begin with an understanding that they'll grow
large in size and small in participants--they evolve that way as we
have them. 

I understand conversations involving technical details, jargon, and
unexplored corners to be on-topic for this list.

.i mu'o mi'e .alyn.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:27:34AM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> There's been a discussion going on that I don't understand, and probably most 
> Lojbanists don't either. I don't know what Montague grammar, Kripke 
> semantics, or Chierchia's down operator is. Should such discussions be taken 
> somewhere else?
> 
> Pierre
> -- 
> li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
> li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
> 

-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.