[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Should we have another mailing list for abstruse discussions?



I've found the recent discussion between jorge and Martin to be by far the most interesting in years. The only reason I've not contributed is that I always agree with jorge and he says all that needs to be said. Anyway, I wanted to point out that the moribund jboske list at yahoogroups remains available, along with its valuable archive. I set it so that new members have to be manually approved, so as to prevent spam, but I could add further moderators.

And.

On 20 Sep 2011 06:28, "Pierre Abbat" <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:

There's been a discussion going on that I don't understand, and probably most
Lojbanists don't either. I don't know what Montague grammar, Kripke
semantics, or Chierchia's down operator is. Should such discussions be taken
somewhere else?

Pierre
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.