Re: [lojban] camxes interpretation

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:05:27AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46:07AM -0700, djandus wrote:
> > coi rodo
> > 
> > http://camxes.lojban.org/?text=.i%20mi%20tatpi%20.ije%20mi%2020bazi%20sipna<http://camxes.lojban.org/?text=.i%20mi%20tatpi%20.ije%20mi%20bazi%20sipna>
> > 
> > So, I'm wondering how to read this -- why is {bazi} grouped with
> > {mi} under "terms" before being grouped with {sipna}? My
> > understanding (reinforced by jboski) was that {bazi} was applied
> > to the selbri and modified it in a role entirely different from
> > the terms of the jufra.
> 
> Known bug; camxes prefers the "PU KU" case to the "PU BRIVLA" case
> (and similarly for other tags).
> 
> Alan's version might have this fixed?, otherwise it'll get fixed by
> me at some point.
> 
> -Robin
> 

It's on my list to fix.  Patches are welcome if you don't want to
wait, otherwise I'll get to it in my turtle-like time.

-Alan
-- 
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.