Re: [lojban] camxes interpretation

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:46:07AM -0700, djandus wrote:
> coi rodo
> 
> http://camxes.lojban.org/?text=.i%20mi%20tatpi%20.ije%20mi%2020bazi%20sipna<http://camxes.lojban.org/?text=.i%20mi%20tatpi%20.ije%20mi%20bazi%20sipna>
> 
> So, I'm wondering how to read this -- why is {bazi} grouped with
> {mi} under "terms" before being grouped with {sipna}? My
> understanding (reinforced by jboski) was that {bazi} was applied
> to the selbri and modified it in a role entirely different from
> the terms of the jufra.

Known bug; camxes prefers the "PU KU" case to the "PU BRIVLA" case
(and similarly for other tags).

Alan's version might have this fixed?, otherwise it'll get fixed by
me at some point.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.