Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Gee, they never taught that one in arithmetic. At a guess, I suppose it 
collapses to either {ro} or {pa fi'u re}.



----- Original Message ----
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, October 21, 2011 9:59:08 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified    plural 
variable

On Thursday 20 October 2011 17:24:01 John E. Clifford wrote:
> But that gets half of the extension of {plise}, not half of the apples I am
> talking about.

Not sure what you mean by "extension", but how about "ro fi'u re plise"?

Pierre
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.