Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> * Tuesday, 2011-10-25 at 19:12 -0300 - Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > OK, so I'm back to {lo ka vofli cipnrxalbatrosi cu xajmi}.
>>
>> What would you put in the x3 of xajmi?
>
> To be vague, {lo ka viska simlu ma kau} ("how it looks", also
> translatable as "how they look").

Do you still require that "lo xajmi cu ckaji lo te xajmi"? If so, does
that mean that a property can be seen? Can it have wings? Can it fly?

If a property can do all those things, then your "lo ka vofli
cipnrxalbatrosi" starts to look a lot like my "lo vofli
cipnrxalbatrosi".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.