Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> * Tuesday, 2011-10-25 at 10:32 +0100 - And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
>> Martin Bays, On 25/10/2011 03:15:
>> > If Lion X is equal to Lion Y, then they satisfy the same predicates. So
>> > if we can agree that Lion X is called Nigel while Lion Y is called
>> > Samantha, or if X likes to eat gazelles while Y prefers humans, then we
>> > must agree that there are at least two lions. Right?
>>
>> So not one lion that changes its name and dietary preferences?
>
> The use of the present tense was intended to rule that out.

Change need not be with respect to time. Consider for example "this
road changes its name at the state border".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.