Re: [lojban] 'standard' bridi form

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

I don't think establishing this as a standard in writing is such a good idea, but yes, I agree that that's standard in practice. The concrete evidence that supports this subjective idea is that {broda ko'a} and {ko'a broda} in the absence of any other sumti are different. So the x1 being before the selbri is "special" while anything else being before the selbri is not.

mu'o mi'e latros

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:30 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

Do you agree with this CLL 9.2 statement:

 This ordering, with the x1 place before the selbri and all other
places in natural order after the selbri, is called standard bridi
form, and is found in the bulk of Lojban bridi, whether used in main
sentences or in subordinate clauses.

Would you say that

 ko'a broda ko'e

or

 ko'a broda gi'e brode vau ko'e

is more 'standard' than

 ko'a ko'e broda

or

 ko'a ko'e broda gi'e brode

mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.