Re: [lojban] self-referential goi

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
> I thought this was cute, and it seems to be allowed by the BPFK section
> definition of {goi}:
>
> {ko'a goi li pa lo'o ce'o ko'a ce'o ke li re lo'o ce'o ko'a zo'u pa
> cimni je terkancu cu mleca lo se zilkancu be lu'i ko'a}
>
> It's the continuum hypothesis ;)

I don't really quite know how either "lu'i" or "ce'o" are meant to work, but...

Assuming ko'a is a set, wouldn't "lu'i ko'a" be a singleton, and so
"lo se zilkancu be lu'i ko'a" be just one?

And doesn't ko'a have only three members: 1, ko'a, {2, ko'a}?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.