Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> I proposing a simple test/definition of when level-mixing has gone too
> far:
>
> A unary broda is Sloppy if, in any domain containing everything which
> can broda,

Every domain contains everything which can broda in that domain, by
definition of "everything" and "domain", how could it be otherwise?
Where are you taking things that broda from?

...
> They try to dodge this problem by introducing informal rules to avoid
> level-mixing within a single domain - in particular, they would never
> consider a domain like those in the definition of Sloppy.

The definition of "Sloppy" is not understandable in the absence of a
Ready Made universe within which "a domain containing everything which
can broda" can be interpreted non-trivially.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.