Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Usual problem with {ka'e}: not clear what the underlying opposing force is.  In 
a couple obvious senses, Merkel could be male.  In others, not so much.



----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, November 17, 2011 4:58:28 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lions and levels and the like

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, maikxlx <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> {-N} in {la .merkel. -N ninmu} quantifies
> over all situations gnomically (where -N means "necessarily" or
> "intrinsically", I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me the
> word(s) I'm looking for) .

Lojban doesn't have a word for the dual of "ka'e", so we have to make
do with "na ka'e na".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.